Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8561 - 8570 of 63907 for records.
Search results 8561 - 8570 of 63907 for records.
[PDF]
WI APP 136
on evidence that was not part of the record at the suppression hearing.”). However, State v. Gaines, 197 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33680 - 2014-09-15
on evidence that was not part of the record at the suppression hearing.”). However, State v. Gaines, 197 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33680 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
. The court of appeals determined that the reconfinement hearing was defective because nothing in the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32589 - 2008-04-30
. The court of appeals determined that the reconfinement hearing was defective because nothing in the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32589 - 2008-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is not supported by the record, and that the court should have required him to have counsel to represent him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102094 - 2026-04-09
is not supported by the record, and that the court should have required him to have counsel to represent him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102094 - 2026-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Although the transcript of the interrogation provided in the record reflects Lehrke’s response to be “Huh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217698 - 2018-08-21
Although the transcript of the interrogation provided in the record reflects Lehrke’s response to be “Huh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217698 - 2018-08-21
Mary Anne Hedrich v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
must deliver to the faculty member a copy of the decision report, a copy of the record of the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2843 - 2005-03-31
must deliver to the faculty member a copy of the decision report, a copy of the record of the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2843 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pablo Cruz Santana
was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior record, and the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12747 - 2005-03-31
was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior record, and the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12747 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marquis O. Gilliam
a hearing problem. But I think that, based on the record that’s been made, there is a basis for striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
a hearing problem. But I think that, based on the record that’s been made, there is a basis for striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
L & M Seed Company, Inc. v. Elk Mound Feed & Farm Supply, Inc.
the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court made, not for findings that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12084 - 2005-03-31
the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court made, not for findings that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12084 - 2005-03-31
Donivan Molitor v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
review the record as augmented by the second board hearing. See Lakeshore Dev. Corp. v. Plan Comm’n, 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31
review the record as augmented by the second board hearing. See Lakeshore Dev. Corp. v. Plan Comm’n, 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Demitrius Goodlow
to a crime; because the evidence in the record did not support the submission of lesser-included offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14910 - 2017-09-21
to a crime; because the evidence in the record did not support the submission of lesser-included offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14910 - 2017-09-21