Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8561 - 8570 of 20929 for word.
Search results 8561 - 8570 of 20929 for word.
[PDF]
Marshall E. Begel v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
that directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly contrary to legislative intent, or is otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2799 - 2017-09-19
that directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly contrary to legislative intent, or is otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2799 - 2017-09-19
Marshall E. Begel v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
). “An unreasonable interpretation of a statute is one that directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
). “An unreasonable interpretation of a statute is one that directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
into that mix rules that trial courts must use “magic words”8 or recite voluminous statements of fact would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739052 - 2023-12-13
into that mix rules that trial courts must use “magic words”8 or recite voluminous statements of fact would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739052 - 2023-12-13
State v. Raymond D. Damouth
facts, and reached a conclusion which a reasonable court could reach. In other words, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5523 - 2005-03-31
facts, and reached a conclusion which a reasonable court could reach. In other words, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5523 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 18
the State’s sentence recommendation. According to Campbell, “Nearly every word of the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57418 - 2014-09-15
the State’s sentence recommendation. According to Campbell, “Nearly every word of the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57418 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the defendant could “get on [his] way,” concluding that the officer’s words and actions, considered as a whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56617 - 2010-11-16
that the defendant could “get on [his] way,” concluding that the officer’s words and actions, considered as a whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56617 - 2010-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
” for the police in conducting the search of his bedroom; in other words, she used her authority as a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54642 - 2010-09-21
” for the police in conducting the search of his bedroom; in other words, she used her authority as a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54642 - 2010-09-21
Gary Hanson v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company
a reasonable person in the position of the insured would have understood the policy’s words to mean. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4788 - 2005-03-31
a reasonable person in the position of the insured would have understood the policy’s words to mean. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4788 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 130
, 681 N.W.2d 110. The plain language is “read where possible to give reasonable effect to every word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88647 - 2014-09-15
, 681 N.W.2d 110. The plain language is “read where possible to give reasonable effect to every word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88647 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Willie Quattlebaum
). The language of the statute supports this conclusion. ¶23 First, the use of the word “shall” indicates
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17244 - 2017-09-21
). The language of the statute supports this conclusion. ¶23 First, the use of the word “shall” indicates
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17244 - 2017-09-21