Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8571 - 8580 of 68926 for he.
Search results 8571 - 8580 of 68926 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. He contends that he is entitled to sentence modification or resentencing on the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95261 - 2013-04-10
postconviction motion. He contends that he is entitled to sentence modification or resentencing on the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95261 - 2013-04-10
State v. Scott H. Petersen
questioned Petersen about his daughter’s allegations that he had sexually assaulted her. He gave two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12154 - 2005-03-31
questioned Petersen about his daughter’s allegations that he had sexually assaulted her. He gave two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
him, and that he was confused during the plea colloquy because he thought the judge would reduce his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245275 - 2019-08-21
him, and that he was confused during the plea colloquy because he thought the judge would reduce his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245275 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for postconviction relief that he filed pursuant to WIS. No. 2010AP235 2 STAT. § 974.06 (2009–10).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59983 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief that he filed pursuant to WIS. No. 2010AP235 2 STAT. § 974.06 (2009–10).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59983 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Moen
to §§ 161.41 (1m)(h) and 161.48, STATS. He was sentenced to five years’ NO. 97-2731-CR-NM 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13038 - 2017-09-21
to §§ 161.41 (1m)(h) and 161.48, STATS. He was sentenced to five years’ NO. 97-2731-CR-NM 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13038 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy S. Moen
, as a repeat offender, contrary to §§ 161.41 (1m)(h) and 161.48, Stats. He was sentenced to five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13038 - 2005-03-31
, as a repeat offender, contrary to §§ 161.41 (1m)(h) and 161.48, Stats. He was sentenced to five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13038 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he did not possess the firearm as charged because the firearm belonged to Cullen, not Pitts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162147 - 2017-09-21
that he did not possess the firearm as charged because the firearm belonged to Cullen, not Pitts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162147 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the respondents, Roland and Diana Reed. ¶3 Vaneman asserts that he, along with his brother, is the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88858 - 2012-10-31
to the respondents, Roland and Diana Reed. ¶3 Vaneman asserts that he, along with his brother, is the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88858 - 2012-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court order denying his motion for postconviction relief that he filed pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59983 - 2011-02-14
a circuit court order denying his motion for postconviction relief that he filed pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59983 - 2011-02-14
Earl E. Grunwald v. Milwaukee Casualty Insurance
Insurance.[2] Grunwald argues that the trial court erred when it determined that he failed to meet his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25981 - 2006-08-29
Insurance.[2] Grunwald argues that the trial court erred when it determined that he failed to meet his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25981 - 2006-08-29