Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8581 - 8590 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8581 - 8590 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
WI APP 57
was revoked and denying his postconviction motion. Brimer argues his Fifth Amendment right against self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48024 - 2014-09-15
was revoked and denying his postconviction motion. Brimer argues his Fifth Amendment right against self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at $6,000, and Moondette was placed into custody. ¶9 Moondette now appeals the July 2025 orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048520 - 2025-12-10
at $6,000, and Moondette was placed into custody. ¶9 Moondette now appeals the July 2025 orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048520 - 2025-12-10
CA Blank Order
motion for eighty-six days of credit against his sentence. Appellate counsel does not discuss Groce’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94997 - 2013-04-01
motion for eighty-six days of credit against his sentence. Appellate counsel does not discuss Groce’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94997 - 2013-04-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
motion for eighty-six days of credit against his sentence. Appellate counsel does not discuss Groce’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94997 - 2014-09-15
motion for eighty-six days of credit against his sentence. Appellate counsel does not discuss Groce’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94997 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
either by Schmidt’s Auto or during the time the automobile was in the custody of Schmidt’s Auto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15
either by Schmidt’s Auto or during the time the automobile was in the custody of Schmidt’s Auto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steven R. Olson
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PETERSON, J. Steven Olson appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4552 - 2013-08-20
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PETERSON, J. Steven Olson appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4552 - 2013-08-20
Town of La Grange v. Robert J. Auchinleck
the requested property violated both §§ 19.21 (custody and delivery of official property and records) and 19.22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11719 - 2005-03-31
the requested property violated both §§ 19.21 (custody and delivery of official property and records) and 19.22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11719 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
decision denying Brown’s suppression motion that Brown was “an individual who does have experience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27492 - 2006-12-18
decision denying Brown’s suppression motion that Brown was “an individual who does have experience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27492 - 2006-12-18
State v. Raymond L. Matzker
(court of appeals case No. 94-3264). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10096 - 2005-03-31
(court of appeals case No. 94-3264). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10096 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of La Grange v. Robert J. Auchinleck
(custody and delivery of official property and records) and 19.22, STATS. (proceedings to compel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11719 - 2014-09-15
(custody and delivery of official property and records) and 19.22, STATS. (proceedings to compel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11719 - 2014-09-15