Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8591 - 8600 of 30662 for WA 0821 1305 0400 Penyedia XRF Gun To Test Gold Murah Kerinci Jambi [[Tigapillar]].

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
tests, and Kaltenbach agreed. Those tests, including a preliminary breath test indicating a .10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611524 - 2023-01-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
testing results. Under the circumstances of this case, the circuit court did not err when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122857 - 2014-10-01

COURT OF APPEALS
for a continuance, made shortly before trial, so that he could retain an expert to address blood alcohol testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122857 - 2014-09-30

[PDF] State v. John P. McWilliams
in the hospital. ¶8 McWilliams agreed at the hospital to submit to a blood sample for a test of his blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6367 - 2017-09-19

City of West Allis v. C. Scott Radtke
breath test. Radtke took the test, with the result being above the legal limit. Prior to asking Radtke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9757 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of West Allis v. C. Scott Radtke
to a chemical breath test. Radtke took the test, with the result being above the legal limit. Prior to asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9757 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
officer did not have the requisite reasonable suspicion to extend her detention for field sobriety testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147170 - 2015-08-26

State v. John P. McWilliams
McWilliams agreed at the hospital to submit to a blood sample for a test of his blood-alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6367 - 2005-03-31

County of Winnebago v. Larry A. Schmitz
test into evidence under the statutory presumption of admissibility provided in the implied consent law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
for the arrest. We affirm the order. ¶2 The test for probable cause in this context is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34375 - 2014-09-15