Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8591 - 8600 of 46967 for show's.
Search results 8591 - 8600 of 46967 for show's.
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Goodvine
. (citation omitted). A. Evidence concerning the gun ¶7 At trial, the State showed a gun to Darnell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7395 - 2017-09-20
. (citation omitted). A. Evidence concerning the gun ¶7 At trial, the State showed a gun to Darnell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7395 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael E. Learmont
, the State requested a minimum one-year sentence, arguing that his criminal record showed a pattern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14673 - 2017-09-21
, the State requested a minimum one-year sentence, arguing that his criminal record showed a pattern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14673 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kevin P. Sullivan
that the evidence was admissible to show Sullivan’s propensity to commit the charged offenses. We therefore uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11217 - 2005-03-31
that the evidence was admissible to show Sullivan’s propensity to commit the charged offenses. We therefore uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Sec. 974.06(4). Successive motions and appeals are barred, unless the defendant can show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193655 - 2017-09-21
. Sec. 974.06(4). Successive motions and appeals are barred, unless the defendant can show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193655 - 2017-09-21
State v. Darrin L. Britt
at 53 (citation omitted). To prevail on this argument, Britt must show that: (1) his trial counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10224 - 2011-11-28
at 53 (citation omitted). To prevail on this argument, Britt must show that: (1) his trial counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10224 - 2011-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
discussion.” Id., ¶89. The State had the burden to show that Stevens initiated further communication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56726 - 2005-03-31
discussion.” Id., ¶89. The State had the burden to show that Stevens initiated further communication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56726 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
show that counsel’s actions or inaction constituted deficient performance and that the deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68343 - 2011-07-25
show that counsel’s actions or inaction constituted deficient performance and that the deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68343 - 2011-07-25
[PDF]
Appendix to Reply Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (BLOC).pdf
essential to an understanding of the issues raised, including oral or written rulings or decisions showing
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/appbriefctobloc2.pdf - 2022-01-04
essential to an understanding of the issues raised, including oral or written rulings or decisions showing
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/appbriefctobloc2.pdf - 2022-01-04
COURT OF APPEALS
not change, and photographs showing some weeds demonstrated that Midwest did not intrude into the farmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36243 - 2009-04-20
not change, and photographs showing some weeds demonstrated that Midwest did not intrude into the farmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36243 - 2009-04-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940358 - 2025-04-15
assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940358 - 2025-04-15