Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8591 - 8600 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 8591 - 8600 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
County of Vilas v. David R. Melstrand
to suppress the marijuana cigarette. It denied them after finding that Melstrand consented to the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4347 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the marijuana cigarette. It denied them after finding that Melstrand consented to the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court would have found the search warrant overbroad
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630415 - 2023-03-08
, the circuit court would have found the search warrant overbroad
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630415 - 2023-03-08
[PDF]
County of Vilas v. David R. Melstrand
that Melstrand consented to the search and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4346 - 2017-09-19
that Melstrand consented to the search and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4346 - 2017-09-19
State v. David R. Melstrand
to suppress the marijuana cigarette. It denied them after finding that Melstrand consented to the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4345 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the marijuana cigarette. It denied them after finding that Melstrand consented to the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4345 - 2005-03-31
County of Vilas v. David R. Melstrand
to suppress the marijuana cigarette. It denied them after finding that Melstrand consented to the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4346 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the marijuana cigarette. It denied them after finding that Melstrand consented to the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
executed a search warrant for a residence associated with Smith at 1223 1/2 Bluff Street in Beloit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149032 - 2017-09-21
executed a search warrant for a residence associated with Smith at 1223 1/2 Bluff Street in Beloit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149032 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David R. Melstrand
that Melstrand consented to the search and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4345 - 2017-09-19
that Melstrand consented to the search and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4345 - 2017-09-19
State v. David Borst
was transported to the county jail by two other officers. Artus testified that he then prepared a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
was transported to the county jail by two other officers. Artus testified that he then prepared a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
[PDF]
State v. David Borst
circumstances of this case. It is undisputed that Artus was involved in the execution of a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19310 - 2017-09-21
circumstances of this case. It is undisputed that Artus was involved in the execution of a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Seth A. Foster - 2005AP002789
that the warrantless search of Foster’s home was a police search and not a probation search, and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25995 - 2017-09-21
that the warrantless search of Foster’s home was a police search and not a probation search, and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25995 - 2017-09-21

