Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 861 - 870 of 3803 for dollar.

Anthony R. Anderson v. MSI Preferred Insurance Company
absolutely no authority for using the dollar value of a claim to determine its merit. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6674 - 2005-03-31

Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
, with annual sales in the millions of dollars during each of its four fiscal years in the period under review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31

Gary L. Retzlaff v. Betty A. Winters
was working in retail for about six dollars per hour. Gary, on the other hand, was earning over $100,000 per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13465 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
vehicles and accessories, with annual sales in the millions of dollars during each of its four fiscal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael J. Kaufman v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation
that even if the clause is unambiguous, Bituminous is not entitled to a dollar-for-dollar setoff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6883 - 2017-09-20

State v. Willy J. Love
by the trial court, “gave a precise, detailed description of a hundred dollar bill air freshener in a fan shape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ralph C. Stayer v. Catharine B. Stayer
of the multi-million dollar home. She used $1.7 million of her separate property to cover construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9671 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
only income from Little Champs is the fifteen dollars an hour he makes as a bookkeeper working about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180948 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI APP 122
does not exceed seventy-four thousand dollars ($74,000) each, exclusive of interests and costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38152 - 2009-08-25

City of Madison v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
if public dollars generated through utility rates were used to subsidize a direct benefit to an exclusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4103 - 2005-03-31