Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 861 - 870 of 50070 for our.
Search results 861 - 870 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a plea agreement. In our order denying the petition, we noted that Macon was arguing that “his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125288 - 2017-09-21
a plea agreement. In our order denying the petition, we noted that Macon was arguing that “his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a sentencing court to impose any portion of a penalty enhancer as extended supervision.” Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42994 - 2014-09-15
a sentencing court to impose any portion of a penalty enhancer as extended supervision.” Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42994 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Juneau County v. Sauk County
meaning is in dispute, our efforts are directed at determining legislative intent. Truttschel v. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12469 - 2017-09-21
meaning is in dispute, our efforts are directed at determining legislative intent. Truttschel v. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12469 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 11
suppression motion was based entirely on our supreme court’s holding in Dagnall. They disagree, in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45147 - 2011-02-07
suppression motion was based entirely on our supreme court’s holding in Dagnall. They disagree, in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45147 - 2011-02-07
Juneau County v. Sauk County
a statute whose meaning is in dispute, our efforts are directed at determining legislative intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12469 - 2005-03-31
a statute whose meaning is in dispute, our efforts are directed at determining legislative intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12469 - 2005-03-31
State v. Domingo Ramirez
U.S. 385 (1997), the United States Supreme Court overruled our supreme court’s holdings in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2278 - 2005-03-31
U.S. 385 (1997), the United States Supreme Court overruled our supreme court’s holdings in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2278 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patricia K.S.
on Roby v. State, 96 Wis. 667, 670, 71 N.W. 1046, 1047 (1897), where our supreme court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10638 - 2005-03-31
on Roby v. State, 96 Wis. 667, 670, 71 N.W. 1046, 1047 (1897), where our supreme court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10638 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patricia K.S.
N.W. 1046, 1047 (1897), where our supreme court stated that “[a] person convicted of crime may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10638 - 2017-09-20
N.W. 1046, 1047 (1897), where our supreme court stated that “[a] person convicted of crime may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10638 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 46
Standard of Review ¶6 Our statutes and case law are silent on the standards and methods for determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109975 - 2017-09-21
Standard of Review ¶6 Our statutes and case law are silent on the standards and methods for determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Domingo Ramirez
Court overruled our supreme court’s holdings in State v. Stevens, 181 Wis. 2d 410, 511 N.W.2d 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2278 - 2017-09-19
Court overruled our supreme court’s holdings in State v. Stevens, 181 Wis. 2d 410, 511 N.W.2d 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2278 - 2017-09-19