Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 861 - 870 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 861 - 870 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. Pedro Figueroa
Figueroa’s next argument is that the State was barred from prosecuting him for intentionally causing a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16168 - 2005-03-31
Figueroa’s next argument is that the State was barred from prosecuting him for intentionally causing a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16168 - 2005-03-31
State v. John W. Moore
in the libraries; and (3) the State lacked authority to prosecute for conduct which occurred on University land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11607 - 2005-03-31
in the libraries; and (3) the State lacked authority to prosecute for conduct which occurred on University land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11607 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the prosecution only had to prove that Knutson knew that the material had the potential to be harmful to others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62889 - 2014-09-15
that the prosecution only had to prove that Knutson knew that the material had the potential to be harmful to others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint from the Jefferson County case. 2 ¶4 Before the jury trial, the prosecution filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143517 - 2017-09-21
complaint from the Jefferson County case. 2 ¶4 Before the jury trial, the prosecution filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143517 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Guillermo Gutierrez
to a charge of retail theft as a repeat offender. Gutierrez claims that the prosecution in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5982 - 2017-09-19
to a charge of retail theft as a repeat offender. Gutierrez claims that the prosecution in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5982 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was improperly instructed that the prosecution only had to prove that Knutson knew that the material had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62889 - 2011-04-19
was improperly instructed that the prosecution only had to prove that Knutson knew that the material had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62889 - 2011-04-19
[PDF]
State v. Alex S.
and the weight of the testimony, rather than to the legality of the prosecution in the first instance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13789 - 2014-09-15
and the weight of the testimony, rather than to the legality of the prosecution in the first instance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13789 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to commencement of a “prosecution.” Poirier does not explain—and we cannot conceive of any reason— why entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
to commencement of a “prosecution.” Poirier does not explain—and we cannot conceive of any reason— why entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Daniel E. Rohe
was used in the prosecution of Rohe, even though the expert witnesses did not testify at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15049 - 2017-09-21
was used in the prosecution of Rohe, even though the expert witnesses did not testify at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15049 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
in a federal prosecution and which did not include the no-contact provision. Earls argued that there were two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129269 - 2014-11-18
in a federal prosecution and which did not include the no-contact provision. Earls argued that there were two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129269 - 2014-11-18