Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 861 - 870 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 861 - 870 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
right to a speedy trial had been violated. See State v. Morris, No. 2000AP310-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74543 - 2014-09-15
right to a speedy trial had been violated. See State v. Morris, No. 2000AP310-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74543 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
noted on the State’s witness lists. Three months after the request and 19 days before the jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
noted on the State’s witness lists. Three months after the request and 19 days before the jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
noted on the State’s witness lists. Three months after the request and 19 days before the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
noted on the State’s witness lists. Three months after the request and 19 days before the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
appealed, represented by counsel, arguing that his right to a speedy trial had been violated. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74543 - 2012-08-29
appealed, represented by counsel, arguing that his right to a speedy trial had been violated. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74543 - 2012-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a continuance, but for Stewart’s speedy trial demand. Because Stewart was offered the option of delaying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162567 - 2017-09-21
a continuance, but for Stewart’s speedy trial demand. Because Stewart was offered the option of delaying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
speedy trial right; the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, erred by denying a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144260 - 2017-09-21
speedy trial right; the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, erred by denying a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144260 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
other remedies available because the PRB could hold a speedy hearing on the charges against Dickau. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26216 - 2006-09-26
other remedies available because the PRB could hold a speedy hearing on the charges against Dickau. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26216 - 2006-09-26
[PDF]
WI APP 186
hold a speedy hearing on the charges against Dickau. ¶14 A hearing on the motions took place before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26216 - 2014-09-15
hold a speedy hearing on the charges against Dickau. ¶14 A hearing on the motions took place before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26216 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was improperly denied the right to counsel; he was denied the right to a speedy trial; there was an error
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266601 - 2020-07-08
was improperly denied the right to counsel; he was denied the right to a speedy trial; there was an error
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266601 - 2020-07-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
could be performed while still meeting the State’s speedy trial demand. ¶6 Navarro filed a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
could be performed while still meeting the State’s speedy trial demand. ¶6 Navarro filed a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25