Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8601 - 8610 of 63678 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8601 - 8610 of 63678 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
12, 2008. On June 17, 2009, Dunn County Human Services took custody of Autumn, and the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86688 - 2012-09-04
12, 2008. On June 17, 2009, Dunn County Human Services took custody of Autumn, and the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86688 - 2012-09-04
State v. Brook Grzelak
, Grzelak filed and argued a motion to dismiss all charges with prejudice under § 976.05(3)(d), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
, Grzelak filed and argued a motion to dismiss all charges with prejudice under § 976.05(3)(d), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the respondent has the prisoner in custody and the reason therefore. WIS. STAT. § 782.14. When a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31050 - 2014-09-15
the respondent has the prisoner in custody and the reason therefore. WIS. STAT. § 782.14. When a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31050 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
motion for eighty-six days of credit against his sentence. Appellate counsel does not discuss Groce’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94997 - 2013-04-01
motion for eighty-six days of credit against his sentence. Appellate counsel does not discuss Groce’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94997 - 2013-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
added), § 782.07(1). The return must state whether the respondent has the prisoner in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
added), § 782.07(1). The return must state whether the respondent has the prisoner in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
WI APP 57
was revoked and denying his postconviction motion. Brimer argues his Fifth Amendment right against self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48024 - 2014-09-15
was revoked and denying his postconviction motion. Brimer argues his Fifth Amendment right against self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48024 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 1, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion to withdraw his plea without an evidentiary hearing. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26956 - 2006-10-31
. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion to withdraw his plea without an evidentiary hearing. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26956 - 2006-10-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of his custodial statements. However, Witkowski’s motion did not indicate which statement this was4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26956 - 2014-09-15
of his custodial statements. However, Witkowski’s motion did not indicate which statement this was4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26956 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
subparagraph � 974.07(6)(a)2.? In reviewing a motion for DNA testing at state expense under Wis. Stat. � 974.07
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=803&year=2016
subparagraph � 974.07(6)(a)2.? In reviewing a motion for DNA testing at state expense under Wis. Stat. � 974.07
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=803&year=2016
[PDF]
Midland Builders, Inc. v. Semling-Menke Co.
Semco’s motion and dismissed Midland’s negligence and strict-responsibility- misrepresentation claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18979 - 2017-09-21
Semco’s motion and dismissed Midland’s negligence and strict-responsibility- misrepresentation claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18979 - 2017-09-21