Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8601 - 8610 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 8601 - 8610 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Michael Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Commission
exercise our supervisory powers to decide a question that he characterizes as publici juris—the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31
exercise our supervisory powers to decide a question that he characterizes as publici juris—the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
) and (4). ¶4 On the date scheduled for trial, Gerardo waived his right to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3427 - 2005-03-31
) and (4). ¶4 On the date scheduled for trial, Gerardo waived his right to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3427 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2009AP2907-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF350
. 2 Spaeth was originally convicted in a trial by jury, but that verdict was overturned after
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58252 - 2014-09-15
. 2 Spaeth was originally convicted in a trial by jury, but that verdict was overturned after
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58252 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The jury instructions for armed robbery and party-to-a-crime were also attached to the questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207099 - 2018-01-12
. The jury instructions for armed robbery and party-to-a-crime were also attached to the questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207099 - 2018-01-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree intentional homicide while using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174071 - 2017-09-21
of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree intentional homicide while using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174071 - 2017-09-21
State v. Giles L. Smith
unambiguously sets forth legislative intent, it is the court's duty to apply that intent to the case at hand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15160 - 2005-03-31
unambiguously sets forth legislative intent, it is the court's duty to apply that intent to the case at hand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15160 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that “plea hearing courts do not have a duty to inform defendants about the mandatory DNA surcharge.” See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218828 - 2018-09-06
that “plea hearing courts do not have a duty to inform defendants about the mandatory DNA surcharge.” See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218828 - 2018-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a jury trial, counsel, and substitution of judge; the State’s responsibility to prove the allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182519 - 2017-09-21
to a jury trial, counsel, and substitution of judge; the State’s responsibility to prove the allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182519 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 2
. Id. “[O]ur duty is to give the policy language its plain meaning and determine what a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105572 - 2017-09-21
. Id. “[O]ur duty is to give the policy language its plain meaning and determine what a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105572 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of nineteen-month-old Shawnagishek Daniels.[2] At Dodge’s jury trial, the State argued Dodge had beaten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79678 - 2012-03-19
of nineteen-month-old Shawnagishek Daniels.[2] At Dodge’s jury trial, the State argued Dodge had beaten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79678 - 2012-03-19