Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8621 - 8630 of 69007 for had.

COURT OF APPEALS
into the driveway leading into the same parking lot that Snyder had entered. The trooper watched Snyder turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123009 - 2014-10-01

[PDF] William J. Steele, Jr. v. Pacesetter Motor Cars, Inc.
) that Steele, who had repeatedly taken his car back to Pacesetter for it to complete the restoration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6248 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Carl E. Merow v. Joseph J. Kox
$147,000 in extra federal estate taxes. Although the plaintiff had retained a CPA to complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10990 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had no further duty to defend PFI under an errors and omissions endorsement after Society deposited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74885 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
“probable cause to believe” that Levasseur had been operating a vehicle while under the influence before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107792 - 2014-02-05

[PDF] State v. Edward J. Parker
that the driver had short hair and the passenger had shoulder length hair. As the officer was preparing to exit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11493 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the victim down while he had penis-to-vagina intercourse with her. ¶3 At disposition, the only disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103044 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Terry Griffith
as Damien Robinson. He asked Robinson when he had obtained a driver's license. Robinson replied that he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17384 - 2017-09-21

Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
. The court also concluded that neither the City of Madison zoning administrator nor the ZBA had the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9324 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the three-year statute of limitations period had lapsed. The circuit court concluded that the Third Amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68025 - 2011-07-13