Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8621 - 8630 of 76641 for search which.

[MS WORD] JC-1611T: Dispositional Order - Protection or Services with Termination of Parental Rights Notice (Chapter 48)
with the Court. This dispositional hearing was held on [Date] , which is the effective date of this Order
/formdisplay/JC-1611T.doc?formNumber=JC-1611T&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-05-20

[MS WORD] JD-1745T: Dispositional Order with Termination of Parental Rights Notice (Delinquent)
hearing was held on [Date] , which is the effective date of this Order. THE COURT FINDS: 1
/formdisplay/JD-1745T.doc?formNumber=JD-1745T&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-07-10

State v. Mark S. Kawa
that he had just come out of the bathroom and was going to get in his car, but forgot which car was his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2403 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
ways, all of which improperly led the jury to find that he was guilty of possessing THC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363254 - 2021-05-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that he and other officers searched the unoccupied home and discovered Romero’s body. Detective Negron
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136377 - 2017-09-21

State v. Walter P. VanDeMortel
of a van involved in a two-vehicle collision in which the driver of the other vehicle was killed. Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13969 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was assigned to monitor the Tenney Lock, which allows boats to travel between Lake Mendota and Lake Monona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107419 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Free Workplace” policy, which provides in part: “All employees will be subject to … random … drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76790 - 2012-02-07

COURT OF APPEALS
vehicle is a seizure, which triggers Fourth Amendment protections from unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107419 - 2014-01-29

State v. David S. Frederick
of subsection (4) which requires a sufficient reason to raise a constitutional issue in a sec. 974.06 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13795 - 2005-03-31