Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8631 - 8640 of 9135 for jurors.
Search results 8631 - 8640 of 9135 for jurors.
COURT OF APPEALS
was polled on its return and the record reflects the court’s finding that all jurors agreed the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36591 - 2009-05-26
was polled on its return and the record reflects the court’s finding that all jurors agreed the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36591 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of an ordinary juror’s experience. Id. at 463-64. However, that is not the case here. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243430 - 2019-07-09
of an ordinary juror’s experience. Id. at 463-64. However, that is not the case here. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243430 - 2019-07-09
[PDF]
Jonas Builders, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
controversy was not fully tried when, for example, a special verdict question leads jurors to focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2915 - 2017-09-19
controversy was not fully tried when, for example, a special verdict question leads jurors to focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2915 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]here is not sufficient evidence for any juror to make a finding of a preponderance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84331 - 2014-09-15
that “[t]here is not sufficient evidence for any juror to make a finding of a preponderance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84331 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
penalties that an accused faces because jurors decide only the facts, not the penalties. In Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32111 - 2014-09-15
penalties that an accused faces because jurors decide only the facts, not the penalties. In Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32111 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the jurors.’” Id. (citation omitted). That is what the prosecutor did here. That one or more reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41717 - 2009-10-05
the jurors.’” Id. (citation omitted). That is what the prosecutor did here. That one or more reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41717 - 2009-10-05
State v. Xavier J. Rockette
reminded the jurors that they, and not she, were the arbiters of witness credibility. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25320 - 2006-06-27
reminded the jurors that they, and not she, were the arbiters of witness credibility. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25320 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
State v. James L. Creamer
of Henderson’s drug use was before the jury. The jurors were aware that, upon his death several weeks after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11430 - 2017-09-19
of Henderson’s drug use was before the jury. The jurors were aware that, upon his death several weeks after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11430 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ronald J. Zanelli
likely to happen. A number of writers have suggested that jurors may be more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11172 - 2005-03-31
likely to happen. A number of writers have suggested that jurors may be more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11172 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
deficient and prejudicial because “[m]ost jurors would have thought that a nine-year-old girl would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96736 - 2013-05-13
deficient and prejudicial because “[m]ost jurors would have thought that a nine-year-old girl would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96736 - 2013-05-13