Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8631 - 8640 of 63853 for records.
Search results 8631 - 8640 of 63853 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the criminal conviction still remains in the record with the Department of Justice (DOJ). ¶9 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86046 - 2012-08-13
, the criminal conviction still remains in the record with the Department of Justice (DOJ). ¶9 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86046 - 2012-08-13
[PDF]
State v. Randolph Scott
properly advised him. We conclude that the record conclusively refutes Scott’s claim, and that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13488 - 2017-09-21
properly advised him. We conclude that the record conclusively refutes Scott’s claim, and that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13488 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
the record, (2) raises seven “omnibus” issues and (3) raises a “second” issue. We will first address his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7469 - 2017-09-20
the record, (2) raises seven “omnibus” issues and (3) raises a “second” issue. We will first address his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7469 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the record supports the circuit court’s decision. No. 2018AP987 3 ¶3 At the extension hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240516 - 2019-05-14
and the record supports the circuit court’s decision. No. 2018AP987 3 ¶3 At the extension hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240516 - 2019-05-14
State v. Kendric J. Winters
. In reviewing the record, we conclude that Winters has failed to overcome the presumption that trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12301 - 2005-03-31
. In reviewing the record, we conclude that Winters has failed to overcome the presumption that trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12301 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
date to a status date and stated that David would have to provide hospital records in order to justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30305 - 2007-09-17
date to a status date and stated that David would have to provide hospital records in order to justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30305 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93382 - 2014-09-15
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93382 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 29, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
to specifically state the information on the record as required by Wis. Stat. § 767.511(1n) because Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52685 - 2010-07-28
to specifically state the information on the record as required by Wis. Stat. § 767.511(1n) because Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52685 - 2010-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202509 - 2017-11-15
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202509 - 2017-11-15
[PDF]
William F. Kelsey v. Jens Otto Luebow
on the record: [T]he defendant [Luebow] agrees to pay to the plaintiff on or before December 1, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11864 - 2017-09-21
on the record: [T]he defendant [Luebow] agrees to pay to the plaintiff on or before December 1, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11864 - 2017-09-21