Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8641 - 8650 of 90072 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Search results 8641 - 8650 of 90072 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this matter is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460605 - 2021-12-09
that this matter is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460605 - 2021-12-09
Michael F. W. v. Betty A. W.
County: JOHN R. RACE and michael s. Gibbs, Judges.[1] Reversed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[2] Ryan R.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6649 - 2005-03-31
County: JOHN R. RACE and michael s. Gibbs, Judges.[1] Reversed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[2] Ryan R.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6649 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael F. W. v. Betty A. W.
County: JOHN R. RACE and MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judges. 1 Reversed. ¶1 SNYDER, J. 2 Ryan R.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6649 - 2017-09-20
County: JOHN R. RACE and MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judges. 1 Reversed. ¶1 SNYDER, J. 2 Ryan R.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6649 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Court COUNTY: Dane JUDGE: Richard G. Niess JUSTICES: KELLY, J., delivered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255434 - 2020-04-24
Court COUNTY: Dane JUDGE: Richard G. Niess JUSTICES: KELLY, J., delivered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255434 - 2020-04-24
[PDF]
November 19, 2010
district from which the case came, if applicable; the county; • the date of the Court of Appeals decision
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57024 - 2014-09-15
district from which the case came, if applicable; the county; • the date of the Court of Appeals decision
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Steven V. v. Kelley H.
the county’s argument that Shirley had not shown prejudice as a result of the summary judgment proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5816 - 2017-09-19
the county’s argument that Shirley had not shown prejudice as a result of the summary judgment proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5816 - 2017-09-19
Steven V. v. Kelley H.
., Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5816 - 2005-03-31
., Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5816 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
County v. S. G. J. (L.C. # 2022GN79) Before Kloppenburg, P.J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888119 - 2024-12-12
County v. S. G. J. (L.C. # 2022GN79) Before Kloppenburg, P.J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888119 - 2024-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
County v. S. G. J. (L.C. # 2022GN79) Before Kloppenburg, P.J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888119 - 2024-12-12
County v. S. G. J. (L.C. # 2022GN79) Before Kloppenburg, P.J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888119 - 2024-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Summary disposition orders may not be cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245615 - 2019-08-28
) Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Summary disposition orders may not be cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245615 - 2019-08-28