Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8651 - 8660 of 12458 for mr.
Search results 8651 - 8660 of 12458 for mr.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
these cases and the plea decisions with Mr. Harris? [Counsel]: I have. THE COURT: Are you satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86900 - 2014-09-15
these cases and the plea decisions with Mr. Harris? [Counsel]: I have. THE COURT: Are you satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86900 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stated: Well, Mr. Zamora, you sat in court, I’m satisfied we went through this, you went through
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199212 - 2017-10-31
stated: Well, Mr. Zamora, you sat in court, I’m satisfied we went through this, you went through
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199212 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
State v. Darryl Wimbish Jones
to know where they were, correct? A: That is not what he told me. He told me that Mrs. Pagliaro had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6545 - 2017-09-19
to know where they were, correct? A: That is not what he told me. He told me that Mrs. Pagliaro had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6545 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or “declar[ing] that Mr. Lavender’s conduct was one of the most aggravated breaches of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98285 - 2014-09-15
or “declar[ing] that Mr. Lavender’s conduct was one of the most aggravated breaches of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98285 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
as it was then? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: All right. Then you have your choice, Mr. Wakershauser, of either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19
as it was then? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: All right. Then you have your choice, Mr. Wakershauser, of either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Curtis E. Dittberner
Kendall testified: “I explained to him the form numerous times and asked that—if he understood it. Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3291 - 2017-09-19
Kendall testified: “I explained to him the form numerous times and asked that—if he understood it. Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3291 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John Robert Rybka
one latent fingerprint on the inside casement. Officer Douglas Williams testified that he asked Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16319 - 2017-09-21
one latent fingerprint on the inside casement. Officer Douglas Williams testified that he asked Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16319 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. Stefko
.2d at 508, 249 N.W.2d at 776, and the fact that the record gives “no indication whatever that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10098 - 2017-09-19
.2d at 508, 249 N.W.2d at 776, and the fact that the record gives “no indication whatever that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10098 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
believed to contain marijuana. ¶4 At that point, Bublitz began to ask questions to “determine Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929659 - 2025-03-19
believed to contain marijuana. ¶4 At that point, Bublitz began to ask questions to “determine Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929659 - 2025-03-19
Frederick T. West v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that “[t]he Commission's main reason for finding that Mr. West had not sustained his burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9712 - 2005-03-31
that “[t]he Commission's main reason for finding that Mr. West had not sustained his burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9712 - 2005-03-31