Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8651 - 8660 of 20929 for word.
Search results 8651 - 8660 of 20929 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Dontrell A. Leflore
alleges that juror number three was subjectively biased. Subjective bias “is revealed through the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5300 - 2017-09-19
alleges that juror number three was subjectively biased. Subjective bias “is revealed through the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5300 - 2017-09-19
State v. John Henry Balsewicz
is permitted to waive what, in the words of Wis. Stat. § 971.14(4)(b), is the defendant’s “respective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15251 - 2005-03-31
is permitted to waive what, in the words of Wis. Stat. § 971.14(4)(b), is the defendant’s “respective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15251 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
promulgated and that the Commission complied with WIS. STAT. § 227.115(2). In other words, we must presume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109502 - 2017-09-21
promulgated and that the Commission complied with WIS. STAT. § 227.115(2). In other words, we must presume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 22
the ALJ concluded that Schigur disclosed “information” as that term is used to define the word “retaliat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134434 - 2017-09-21
the ALJ concluded that Schigur disclosed “information” as that term is used to define the word “retaliat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134434 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Crystal L. Bizzle
reasonable interpretation. The State resorts to a dictionary to argue that the word No. 97-2616-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12990 - 2017-09-21
reasonable interpretation. The State resorts to a dictionary to argue that the word No. 97-2616-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12990 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 83
that confers a general benefit; in other words, a substantially equal benefit and advantage to the whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63792 - 2014-09-15
that confers a general benefit; in other words, a substantially equal benefit and advantage to the whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63792 - 2014-09-15
State v. Calvin Pluim
but were unclear and unartfully worded statements. For instance, Pluim takes issue with Framke’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
but were unclear and unartfully worded statements. For instance, Pluim takes issue with Framke’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
absurd or unreasonable results. Id., ¶46. In addition, “[a] statute should be construed so that no word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86397 - 2012-08-22
absurd or unreasonable results. Id., ¶46. In addition, “[a] statute should be construed so that no word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86397 - 2012-08-22
[PDF]
Mineral Point Unified School District v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
(1995). A decision is unreasonable if it directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3941 - 2017-09-20
(1995). A decision is unreasonable if it directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3941 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. In other words, the facts are not contingent and uncertain where a “bona fide controversy” exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113177 - 2014-05-28
. In other words, the facts are not contingent and uncertain where a “bona fide controversy” exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113177 - 2014-05-28