Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8661 - 8670 of 91115 for 1.
Search results 8661 - 8670 of 91115 for 1.
Village of Germantown v. Frederick A. Wittenberger
. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1] Frederick A. Wittenberger appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7599 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1] Frederick A. Wittenberger appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7599 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: jEFFREY A. KREMERS and jOSEPH R. WALL, Judges.[1] Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33999 - 2008-09-15
: jEFFREY A. KREMERS and jOSEPH R. WALL, Judges.[1] Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33999 - 2008-09-15
[PDF]
Racine Education Association v. Racine Unified School District
, P.J., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The Racine Education Association appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15574 - 2017-09-21
, P.J., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The Racine Education Association appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15574 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
(2011-12),[1] concluding no grounds exist to challenge Muelver’s convictions for two counts of repeated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101774 - 2013-09-09
(2011-12),[1] concluding no grounds exist to challenge Muelver’s convictions for two counts of repeated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101774 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2017AP25 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Corral, pro se, appeals from a default judgment granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212879 - 2018-05-15
). No. 2017AP25 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Corral, pro se, appeals from a default judgment granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212879 - 2018-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209020 - 2018-02-27
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209020 - 2018-02-27
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Lazarewicz
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.1 Matthew J. Lazarewicz appeals from a judgment of conviction for resisting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3252 - 2017-09-19
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.1 Matthew J. Lazarewicz appeals from a judgment of conviction for resisting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3252 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J.[1] Fred A. Ederer appeals a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64001 - 2011-05-11
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J.[1] Fred A. Ederer appeals a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64001 - 2011-05-11
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
proceeding. Reinstatement granted. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review a referee's report recommending
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24518 - 2006-03-16
proceeding. Reinstatement granted. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review a referee's report recommending
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24518 - 2006-03-16
State v. Matthew E. Haas
A. SIMANEK, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, P.J.[1] Matthew E. Haas appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19944 - 2005-10-18
A. SIMANEK, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, P.J.[1] Matthew E. Haas appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19944 - 2005-10-18