Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8661 - 8670 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8661 - 8670 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
State v. James P.
reviewed de novo by this court. Columbus Park Hous. Corp. v. City of Kenosha, 2003 WI 143, ¶9, 267 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18613 - 2005-06-16
reviewed de novo by this court. Columbus Park Hous. Corp. v. City of Kenosha, 2003 WI 143, ¶9, 267 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18613 - 2005-06-16
State v. Marvin Prince
the denial of Prince’s plea withdrawal request de novo because “the facts surrounding the state’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12353 - 2005-03-31
the denial of Prince’s plea withdrawal request de novo because “the facts surrounding the state’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12353 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a claim for breach of fiduciary duty presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Jorgensen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35983 - 2009-03-25
of a claim for breach of fiduciary duty presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Jorgensen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35983 - 2009-03-25
2006 WI APP 179
under Wis. Stat. § 980.09(2)(a) presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Dunn, 121 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26170 - 2006-09-26
under Wis. Stat. § 980.09(2)(a) presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Dunn, 121 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26170 - 2006-09-26
00-CV-3379 Dotty Dumpling's Dowry, Ltd. v. Community Development Authority of the City of Madison
judgment, and accordingly, we review the issuance of the writ de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4191 - 2005-03-31
judgment, and accordingly, we review the issuance of the writ de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4191 - 2005-03-31
Catherine G. Henry, M.d. v. Riverwood Clinic
N.W.2d 733, 735 (Ct. App. 1984). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7875 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 733, 735 (Ct. App. 1984). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7875 - 2005-03-31
Steven J. Albrechtsen v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
that our review is de novo because the decision under review addresses the Commission’s subject matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19929 - 2005-12-11
that our review is de novo because the decision under review addresses the Commission’s subject matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19929 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
Repap Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
and does not claim to have any particular expertise in applying § 227.42, we review this issue de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9020 - 2017-09-19
and does not claim to have any particular expertise in applying § 227.42, we review this issue de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172145 - 2017-09-21
of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172145 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 62
is not such a “person.” General Casualty, however, is such a “person” because General Casualty “ma[de] … payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110452 - 2017-09-21
is not such a “person.” General Casualty, however, is such a “person” because General Casualty “ma[de] … payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110452 - 2017-09-21