Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8661 - 8670 of 24443 for extending.
Search results 8661 - 8670 of 24443 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision. The record discloses no arguable manifest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170541 - 2017-09-21
’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision. The record discloses no arguable manifest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170541 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jason Luepke
date remained unchanged after resentencing, the new sentence extended Luepke’s mandatory release date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31
date remained unchanged after resentencing, the new sentence extended Luepke’s mandatory release date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. The no-merit report discusses whether the record would support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825745 - 2024-07-17
years of extended supervision. The no-merit report discusses whether the record would support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825745 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth G. Gering
the notice of appeal was not timely filed and the motion to extend the time did not show good cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10201 - 2017-09-20
the notice of appeal was not timely filed and the motion to extend the time did not show good cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10201 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
year of extended supervision. The circuit court considered the appropriate sentencing factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91599 - 2014-09-15
year of extended supervision. The circuit court considered the appropriate sentencing factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91599 - 2014-09-15
State v. James D. Crochiere
’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. ¶3 Whether a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5449 - 2005-03-31
’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. ¶3 Whether a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5449 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
In December 2006, Stites was sentenced to two years of initial confinement and two years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102156 - 2017-09-21
In December 2006, Stites was sentenced to two years of initial confinement and two years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and two years of extended supervision on each count, to be served consecutively. Wright filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213874 - 2018-06-04
and two years of extended supervision on each count, to be served consecutively. Wright filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213874 - 2018-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Rogers
to a thirty-day jail term and a $790 fine, and extended his license revocation sixteen months. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10343 - 2017-09-20
to a thirty-day jail term and a $790 fine, and extended his license revocation sixteen months. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10343 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and ten years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794628 - 2024-05-01
and ten years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794628 - 2024-05-01