Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8661 - 8670 of 20941 for word.

[PDF] Stephen J. Kasun, Jr. v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
; it is consistent with the wording of the verdicts on questions 2 and 51. The Kasuns’ theory, on the other hand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3050 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a contract reasonably so as to avoid absurd results, give words their plain meaning, read it as a whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189731 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the children’s post high school education because—in his own words—“they [were] not owed,” the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257972 - 2020-04-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that no word or clause shall be rendered surplusage and every word if possible [is] given effect.” Donaldson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86397 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] R. Scott McCormick v. Richard A. Schubring
road. He inquired "by word of mouth" and tried, unsuccessfully, to find public records relating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16617 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 83
that confers a general benefit; in other words, a substantially equal benefit and advantage to the whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63792 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Karen Suchomel v. University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
that technical or specially-defined words are given their technical or special definitions. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20007 - 2017-09-21

Marshall E. Begel v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
). “An unreasonable interpretation of a statute is one that directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31

County of Ozaukee v. Nancy L. Quelle
an inability to digest and interpret the words and phrases of the form. Under Bryant, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8935 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
promulgated and that the Commission complied with Wis. Stat. § 227.115(2). In other words, we must presume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109502 - 2014-03-24