Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8671 - 8680 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Jones has not established substantial prejudice from the joint trial. For these reasons, a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042535 - 2025-11-25

[PDF] May 31, 2012
in custody initiates communication with the police after previously invoking his Miranda right to consult
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83281 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. William D. Olson
denying his postconviction motion for relief.1 The trial court sentenced him to a two-year term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8359 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
Cain Moss filed a motion to suppress statements that he made during the in-custody interview and all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04

[PDF] State v. William D. Olson
denying his postconviction motion for relief.1 The trial court sentenced him to a two-year term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8358 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. William D. Olson
denying his postconviction motion for relief.1 The trial court sentenced him to a two-year term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8357 - 2017-09-19

[MS WORD] JD-1792: Order for Change in Placement (Out-of-Home to In-Home Placement Only)
physical custody order. |_| dispositional order. |_| 2. A notice of change in placement has
/formdisplay/JD-1792.doc?formNumber=JD-1792&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-25

[MS WORD] CR-280: Order on Competency
from custody. |_| B. The defendant shall appear in court at specified intervals, every month
/formdisplay/CR-280.doc?formNumber=CR-280&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-12-01

[PDF] City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
building code, all affecting rental property they owned as joint tenants. Mrs. Negley appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erred when it denied his motion to suppress. Upon review, we affirm. We conclude that the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902001 - 2025-01-22