Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8671 - 8680 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8671 - 8680 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
possessed—that is, exercised individual or joint control over—a substance; (2) the substance was THC; (3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175031 - 2017-09-21
possessed—that is, exercised individual or joint control over—a substance; (2) the substance was THC; (3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175031 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Interbranch communication - handout
informed, and these meetings have paved the way for better ongoing communication. Joint meetings
/courts/resources/docs/communications.pdf - 2021-07-29
informed, and these meetings have paved the way for better ongoing communication. Joint meetings
/courts/resources/docs/communications.pdf - 2021-07-29
[PDF]
Case of the month - September 2015
jointly petitioned the Supreme Court to take the case and bypass the Court of Appeals. The joint bypass
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/sept15.pdf - 2015-09-09
jointly petitioned the Supreme Court to take the case and bypass the Court of Appeals. The joint bypass
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/sept15.pdf - 2015-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as read-in offenses, a joint request for a presentence investigation report (PSI), and the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081524 - 2026-02-24
as read-in offenses, a joint request for a presentence investigation report (PSI), and the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081524 - 2026-02-24
Anthony Meriwether v. Fred Melindez
determination. We conclude the trial court properly dismissed the joint complaint and petition under § 802.05(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15373 - 2005-03-31
determination. We conclude the trial court properly dismissed the joint complaint and petition under § 802.05(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Decade, Inc. v. Joint Comm. for Review of Admin. Rules, 73 Wis. 2d 234, 236, 243 N.W.2d 497 (1976
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184997 - 2017-09-21
. Decade, Inc. v. Joint Comm. for Review of Admin. Rules, 73 Wis. 2d 234, 236, 243 N.W.2d 497 (1976
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
3 Based upon the parties’ joint recommendation, the circuit court imposed two years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699387 - 2023-09-06
3 Based upon the parties’ joint recommendation, the circuit court imposed two years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699387 - 2023-09-06
Rule Order
Oversight and the Preliminary Review Committee filed a joint petition seeking to amend Supreme Court Rules
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60362 - 2011-03-01
Oversight and the Preliminary Review Committee filed a joint petition seeking to amend Supreme Court Rules
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60362 - 2011-03-01
Rule Order
On May 22, 2006, the Office of Lawyer Regulation and the State Bar of Wisconsin filed a joint petition
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50522 - 2010-07-05
On May 22, 2006, the Office of Lawyer Regulation and the State Bar of Wisconsin filed a joint petition
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50522 - 2010-07-05
State v. Keith D. McEvoy
). Here, the trial court accepted the parties’ joint sentencing recommendation. Both parties believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14641 - 2005-03-31
). Here, the trial court accepted the parties’ joint sentencing recommendation. Both parties believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14641 - 2005-03-31