Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8671 - 8680 of 24443 for extending.
Search results 8671 - 8680 of 24443 for extending.
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Rogers
to a thirty-day jail term and a $790 fine, and extended his license revocation sixteen months. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10343 - 2017-09-20
to a thirty-day jail term and a $790 fine, and extended his license revocation sixteen months. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10343 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and ten years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794628 - 2024-05-01
and ten years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794628 - 2024-05-01
State v. Thomas Sparks
of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, Kheyfets v. Commonwealth, 654 A.2d 102 (Pa. 1995), extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8624 - 2005-03-31
of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, Kheyfets v. Commonwealth, 654 A.2d 102 (Pa. 1995), extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8624 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a total of nine years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288102 - 2020-09-22
to a total of nine years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288102 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not offer any evidence of extending his search for employment outside of his field. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045102 - 2025-12-04
did not offer any evidence of extending his search for employment outside of his field. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045102 - 2025-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
followed by three years’ extended supervision on each of the two delivery counts— to be served concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
followed by three years’ extended supervision on each of the two delivery counts— to be served concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
State v. Joan Schmitz
because her understanding of “contact” did not extend to just sitting next to Andrea N. in a courtroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16324 - 2005-03-31
because her understanding of “contact” did not extend to just sitting next to Andrea N. in a courtroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16324 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years’ extended supervision. The judgment also required Landa to register as a sex offender. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92224 - 2014-09-15
years’ extended supervision. The judgment also required Landa to register as a sex offender. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92224 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by twelve years of extended supervision. In 2009, this court affirmed Daniels’ conviction. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173685 - 2017-09-21
by twelve years of extended supervision. In 2009, this court affirmed Daniels’ conviction. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173685 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and six years of extended supervision). Starry received sentence credit and was deemed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218755 - 2018-09-12
confinement and six years of extended supervision). Starry received sentence credit and was deemed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218755 - 2018-09-12