Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8671 - 8680 of 75041 for public records.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91295 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, WI 53913 William E. Schmaal Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101834 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208318 - 2018-02-08

CA Blank Order
. Box 1001 Elkhorn, WI 53121-1001 Ellen J. Krahn Assistant State Public Defender P. O. Box 7862
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139093 - 2015-04-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, as well as having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089647 - 2026-03-12

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. Box 7857 Madison, WI 53707-7857 Katie R. York Asst. State Public Defender P. O. Box 7862
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98401 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
a “serious significant prior criminal record” and had committed a crime that was of an “opportunistic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204293 - 2017-12-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883780 - 2024-12-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108670 - 2017-09-21