Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8681 - 8690 of 49833 for our.
Search results 8681 - 8690 of 49833 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(listing circuit court duties); WIS. STAT. § 971.08. Our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817815 - 2024-06-25
(listing circuit court duties); WIS. STAT. § 971.08. Our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817815 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the response, and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgments and order may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228321 - 2018-11-28
, the response, and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgments and order may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228321 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369231 - 2021-05-26
, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369231 - 2021-05-26
[PDF]
State v. Donald P. Sullivan
reverse and order that he be resentenced. The State responds that our review of sentencing decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10129 - 2017-09-19
reverse and order that he be resentenced. The State responds that our review of sentencing decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10129 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
is the following provision: “‘We’ pay, up to ‘our’ ‘limit,’ all sums for which any ‘insured’ is liable by law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142982 - 2015-06-10
is the following provision: “‘We’ pay, up to ‘our’ ‘limit,’ all sums for which any ‘insured’ is liable by law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142982 - 2015-06-10
Anne C. Hepperla v. John D. Puchner
regarding our jurisdiction, we concluded that Puchner did not timely appeal from the order granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14847 - 2005-03-31
regarding our jurisdiction, we concluded that Puchner did not timely appeal from the order granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14847 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ray Lee Wimer
” or include that element. In Laxton, as here, the circuit court used Wis JI—Criminal 2502. Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4416 - 2005-03-31
” or include that element. In Laxton, as here, the circuit court used Wis JI—Criminal 2502. Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4416 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, to which counsel has filed a supplemental report. Upon our independent review of the entire record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595333 - 2022-11-29
, to which counsel has filed a supplemental report. Upon our independent review of the entire record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595333 - 2022-11-29
T.R. Thompson Builders, Inc. v. City of Madison Zoning Board of Appeals
On certiorari review of municipal decisions our review is identical to that in the trial court. City News
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2293 - 2005-03-31
On certiorari review of municipal decisions our review is identical to that in the trial court. City News
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2293 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
App 172, ¶10, 256 Wis. 2d 787, 650 N.W.2d 43 (citation omitted). Our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79524 - 2012-03-14
App 172, ¶10, 256 Wis. 2d 787, 650 N.W.2d 43 (citation omitted). Our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79524 - 2012-03-14