Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8691 - 8700 of 18662 for quote.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the court should deny the request for an injunction.” Id., ¶9 (quoting Goode, 219 Wis. 2d at 684). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71743 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985) (quoted source, internal citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114894 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
., ¶40 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975)). We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252025 - 2020-01-02

State v. Antwan Battles
ruling that: That instruction and defense requires, and I’m quoting from instruction 790 at this time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
and of no precedential value. However, more importantly, the current rule as quoted above is the only operative rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5007 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence, and we may not substitute our view of the evidence for that of the [agency].” Id. (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383243 - 2021-07-01

State v. Danny L. Peterson
at 498. See Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 318-19 (quoting the same). State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20676 - 2005-12-19

State v. Feleipe Harris
' of their pleas.” James, 176 Wis.2d at 238, 500 N.W.2d at 348 (quoting Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 755
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 580 N.W.2d 340 (Ct. App. 1998) (quoted source omitted). CONCLUSION ¶15 In sum, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=942615 - 2025-04-17

[PDF] State v. Shawn A. Timm
or unparticularized suspicion or ‘hunch’” will not suffice. Id. (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4847 - 2017-09-19