Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 871 - 880 of 3809 for dollar.

Ralph C. Stayer v. Catharine B. Stayer
-million dollar home. She used $1.7 million of her separate property to cover construction expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9671 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 122
of the Class does not exceed seventy-four thousand dollars ($74,000) each, exclusive of interests and costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38152 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Anthony R. Anderson v. MSI Preferred Insurance Company
provides absolutely no authority for using the dollar value of a claim to determine its merit. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6674 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Michael J. Kaufman v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation
that even if the clause is unambiguous, Bituminous is not entitled to a dollar-for-dollar setoff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6883 - 2017-09-20

State v. Willy J. Love
by the trial court, “gave a precise, detailed description of a hundred dollar bill air freshener in a fan shape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31

Gary L. Retzlaff v. Betty A. Winters
was working in retail for about six dollars per hour. Gary, on the other hand, was earning over $100,000 per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13465 - 2005-03-31

2008 WI APP 56
of asbestos cement.” Horak asserts that more than “$7,500 total dollars (in early 1960s dollars) of asbestos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31846 - 2008-04-29

[PDF] Gene L. Olstad v. Microsoft Corporation
, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, or by imprisonment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18993 - 2017-09-21

Mount Horeb Community Alert v. Village Board of Mt. Horeb
to all new million dollar construction projects), sets forth a permanent rule until repealed, and creates
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16539 - 2005-03-31

Shane T. Drinkwater v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
, it was entitled to "first dollar" reimbursement and payment in full for all of its subrogated expenses without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25375 - 2006-05-31