Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 871 - 880 of 70160 for his.
Search results 871 - 880 of 70160 for his.
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert T. Malloy
as discipline for professional misconduct. That misconduct consisted of his mishandling of client funds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17112 - 2017-09-21
as discipline for professional misconduct. That misconduct consisted of his mishandling of client funds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17112 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert T. Malloy
as discipline for professional misconduct. That misconduct consisted of his mishandling of client funds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17112 - 2005-03-31
as discipline for professional misconduct. That misconduct consisted of his mishandling of client funds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a response, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Counsel has filed a supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286184 - 2020-09-10
filed a response, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Counsel has filed a supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286184 - 2020-09-10
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffrey D. Knickmeier
Knickmeier perceives to have been the improper and unconstitutional temporary suspension of his license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16671 - 2005-03-31
Knickmeier perceives to have been the improper and unconstitutional temporary suspension of his license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16671 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffrey D. Knickmeier
and unconstitutional temporary suspension of his license to practice No. 02-2438-D 3 law pursuant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16671 - 2017-09-21
and unconstitutional temporary suspension of his license to practice No. 02-2438-D 3 law pursuant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16671 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on grounds that: (1) he had contested the factual basis for the plea during allocution, (2) his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42294 - 2009-10-20
on grounds that: (1) he had contested the factual basis for the plea during allocution, (2) his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42294 - 2009-10-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
), and No. 2007AP801-CR 2 939.05 (2001-02).1 Wells seeks a new trial, contending that his confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32281 - 2014-09-15
), and No. 2007AP801-CR 2 939.05 (2001-02).1 Wells seeks a new trial, contending that his confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32281 - 2014-09-15
State v. Richard C. Wos
was denied his right to testify at his jury trial and, had he testified, there was a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2582 - 2005-03-31
was denied his right to testify at his jury trial and, had he testified, there was a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard P. Gilliland
, J. Richard Peter Gilliland appeals the order denying his postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25917 - 2017-09-21
, J. Richard Peter Gilliland appeals the order denying his postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25917 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
(amended Feb. 1, 2003), and 939.05 (2001-02).[1] Wells seeks a new trial, contending that his confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32281 - 2008-03-31
(amended Feb. 1, 2003), and 939.05 (2001-02).[1] Wells seeks a new trial, contending that his confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32281 - 2008-03-31