Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 871 - 880 of 85540 for substitution of judge.
Search results 871 - 880 of 85540 for substitution of judge.
[PDF]
John A. Seitz v. Waukesha County
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9550 - 2017-09-19
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9550 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Shane M. Kringen
of the circuit court for St. Croix County: C.A. RICHARDS and EDWARD F. VLACK, Judges. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5791 - 2017-09-19
of the circuit court for St. Croix County: C.A. RICHARDS and EDWARD F. VLACK, Judges. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5791 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and remanded the matter for resentencing. ¶4 After substitution of judge, the court imposed a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94298 - 2014-09-15
and remanded the matter for resentencing. ¶4 After substitution of judge, the court imposed a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94298 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment and remanded the matter for resentencing. ¶4 After substitution of judge, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94298 - 2013-03-18
the judgment and remanded the matter for resentencing. ¶4 After substitution of judge, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94298 - 2013-03-18
[PDF]
16-05D Proposed Amendmet to Interim Rules
of the judges designated for the commercial court docket. In the event of a request for judicial substitution
/supreme/docs/1605dpropamend.pdf - 2022-02-14
of the judges designated for the commercial court docket. In the event of a request for judicial substitution
/supreme/docs/1605dpropamend.pdf - 2022-02-14
[PDF]
16-05 Interim Rules - As Amended (06-29-22)
pursuant to s.751.03(3), stats. In the event a request for substitution is filed against the judge
/supreme/docs/1605interimruleasamend0629.pdf - 2022-06-29
pursuant to s.751.03(3), stats. In the event a request for substitution is filed against the judge
/supreme/docs/1605interimruleasamend0629.pdf - 2022-06-29
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 16-05A - Interim rule
), stats. In the event a request for substitution is filed against the judge chosen by the chief judge
/supreme/docs/1605ainterimrule.pdf - 2020-02-13
), stats. In the event a request for substitution is filed against the judge chosen by the chief judge
/supreme/docs/1605ainterimrule.pdf - 2020-02-13
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 16-05B - Interim rule (as amended 2/20/20)
. In the event a request for substitution is filed against the judge chosen by the chief judge of the Judicial
/supreme/docs/1605binterimrule.pdf - 2020-02-20
. In the event a request for substitution is filed against the judge chosen by the chief judge of the Judicial
/supreme/docs/1605binterimrule.pdf - 2020-02-20
State v. Casey J. Schneck
. There, the amicus curiae argued that the substitution of judge provisions were “incompatible” with a Wis. Stat. ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
. There, the amicus curiae argued that the substitution of judge provisions were “incompatible” with a Wis. Stat. ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 13-04 - Response from Office of Lawyer Regulation
selected, except that referees should be reserve judges or attorneys with substantial judicial
/supreme/docs/1304responseolr.pdf - 2013-09-18
selected, except that referees should be reserve judges or attorneys with substantial judicial
/supreme/docs/1304responseolr.pdf - 2013-09-18