Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8701 - 8710 of 75051 for public records.
Search results 8701 - 8710 of 75051 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108670 - 2017-09-21
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108670 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the case, which were aggravated by Hicks’ prior record, the sentence does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108670 - 2014-03-11
of the case, which were aggravated by Hicks’ prior record, the sentence does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108670 - 2014-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and excessive. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102304 - 2017-09-21
and excessive. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP432-CRNM 2 and he has not responded. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825641 - 2024-07-17
. No. 2023AP432-CRNM 2 and he has not responded. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825641 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Willie J. Dobson
) the gravity of the offense; (2) the character of the offender; and (3) the need to protect the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7936 - 2017-09-19
) the gravity of the offense; (2) the character of the offender; and (3) the need to protect the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7936 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP1503-CRNM 2 have independently reviewed the record and no-merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392778 - 2021-07-20
. No. 2020AP1503-CRNM 2 have independently reviewed the record and no-merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392778 - 2021-07-20
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
that the sentencing record reflected a lack of reasoning for imposing a consecutive sentence and for declaring her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
that the sentencing record reflected a lack of reasoning for imposing a consecutive sentence and for declaring her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
Dennis Marth v. David A. Schwarz
argues that the revocation decision is arbitrary and unreasonable because the record demonstrates that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9903 - 2005-03-31
argues that the revocation decision is arbitrary and unreasonable because the record demonstrates that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9903 - 2005-03-31