Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8701 - 8710 of 83759 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 8701 - 8710 of 83759 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Scott A. Unertl
the consent to search Unertl gave police, and whether police had probable cause to arrest Unertl based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21440 - 2006-02-15
the consent to search Unertl gave police, and whether police had probable cause to arrest Unertl based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21440 - 2006-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶3 This case arose from Jew’s conduct between January 12, 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269526 - 2020-07-14
affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶3 This case arose from Jew’s conduct between January 12, 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269526 - 2020-07-14
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=248&year=2011
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=248&year=2011
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/archive.jsp?year=2009
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/archive.jsp?year=2009
State v. David J.M.
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David J.M.
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dwayne Williams
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey L. Meyers
to a crime, contrary to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, Stats. Meyers contends that the warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8910 - 2005-03-31
to a crime, contrary to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, Stats. Meyers contends that the warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8910 - 2005-03-31
Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
, searched Oney's house pursuant to a search warrant. Various items were seized during the search. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8220 - 2005-03-31
, searched Oney's house pursuant to a search warrant. Various items were seized during the search. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
with another Sheboygan County sheriff's detective and a probation officer, searched Oney's house pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19
with another Sheboygan County sheriff's detective and a probation officer, searched Oney's house pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19