Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8711 - 8720 of 68468 for did.
Search results 8711 - 8720 of 68468 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facie showing that he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82459 - 2014-09-15
facie showing that he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82459 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ imprisonment on Count 4, the court did not inform him of the maximum penalty for Count 7. Appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699165 - 2023-09-06
’ imprisonment on Count 4, the court did not inform him of the maximum penalty for Count 7. Appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699165 - 2023-09-06
Terry Lee Railing v. Jacqueline S. Railing
appealed, and that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Jacqueline reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11145 - 2005-03-31
appealed, and that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Jacqueline reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11145 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with use of a dangerous weapon. He alleged his plea was not voluntary and knowing because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36850 - 2009-06-22
with use of a dangerous weapon. He alleged his plea was not voluntary and knowing because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36850 - 2009-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Terrance A. Garner
of justice. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3775 - 2017-09-19
of justice. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3775 - 2017-09-19
State v. Todd S. Sincock
did not violate Sincock’s constitutional rights; because the trial court’s rulings did not evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12949 - 2005-03-31
did not violate Sincock’s constitutional rights; because the trial court’s rulings did not evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12949 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rates. Dr. Mickelson stated that she did not insert a fetal scalp electrode because Raquel had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239073 - 2019-04-16
rates. Dr. Mickelson stated that she did not insert a fetal scalp electrode because Raquel had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239073 - 2019-04-16
Patricia Ann Johnson v. Bruce Hinton Johnson
exclusive control over the family's financial matters and did not take a regular salary, but took funds out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8442 - 2005-03-31
exclusive control over the family's financial matters and did not take a regular salary, but took funds out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8442 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this conviction should not be counted because he did not have counsel in proceedings related to the 2000 offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614898 - 2023-02-01
that this conviction should not be counted because he did not have counsel in proceedings related to the 2000 offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614898 - 2023-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
is not entitled to withdraw his plea because Price did not establish that but for counsel’s allegedly deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82078 - 2012-05-08
is not entitled to withdraw his plea because Price did not establish that but for counsel’s allegedly deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82078 - 2012-05-08