Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8711 - 8720 of 61771 for does.
Search results 8711 - 8720 of 61771 for does.
State v. James Gulley
, that because Gulley asserted ineffective assistance of counsel, Escalona does not bar the motion. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3792 - 2005-03-31
, that because Gulley asserted ineffective assistance of counsel, Escalona does not bar the motion. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3792 - 2005-03-31
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
limit under the PLRA does not apply to his challenge to his parole revocation and, therefore, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16193 - 2005-03-31
limit under the PLRA does not apply to his challenge to his parole revocation and, therefore, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16193 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed the award. Prent then filed this appeal. As we explain, Prent’s argument on appeal does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79223 - 2012-03-07
affirmed the award. Prent then filed this appeal. As we explain, Prent’s argument on appeal does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79223 - 2012-03-07
2007 WI APP 125
)”: “A recovery is a return of an amount you deducted or took a credit for in an earlier year.” Dettwiler does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26
)”: “A recovery is a return of an amount you deducted or took a credit for in an earlier year.” Dettwiler does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
investigation” stated: “This investigator attempted to contact Bridgett [S]. It was learned that Ms. [S.] does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27267 - 2006-11-27
investigation” stated: “This investigator attempted to contact Bridgett [S]. It was learned that Ms. [S.] does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27267 - 2006-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the defendant to relief, “or presents only conclusory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the defendant to relief, “or presents only conclusory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
in light of Post, we conclude that Post does not warrant a different result. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29875 - 2014-09-15
in light of Post, we conclude that Post does not warrant a different result. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Larry George
to seek disposition of these charges. Section 971.11(1) does not require the warden to extrapolate from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6128 - 2017-09-19
to seek disposition of these charges. Section 971.11(1) does not require the warden to extrapolate from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6128 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶9, 248 Wis. 2d 259, 270, 635 N.W.2d 838, 845. Here, Farrell does not tell us what questions trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
, ¶9, 248 Wis. 2d 259, 270, 635 N.W.2d 838, 845. Here, Farrell does not tell us what questions trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
Sorry. Okay. [Y]ou have an—you have a—[“]see intentional[”] on here. A JUROR: Yes. THE COURT: Does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56196 - 2010-11-01
Sorry. Okay. [Y]ou have an—you have a—[“]see intentional[”] on here. A JUROR: Yes. THE COURT: Does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56196 - 2010-11-01