Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8761 - 8770 of 68485 for did.
Search results 8761 - 8770 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
various people, including his probation officer, that he did not have any money. Fifth, police found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208204 - 2018-02-08
various people, including his probation officer, that he did not have any money. Fifth, police found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208204 - 2018-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by excluding Dr. Monson. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022587 - 2025-10-14
that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by excluding Dr. Monson. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022587 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
State v. Michael Washington
findings of what counsel did and the basis for the challenged conduct are factual and will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8611 - 2017-09-19
findings of what counsel did and the basis for the challenged conduct are factual and will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8611 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Alonna L. Koenig
WIS. STAT. § 59.34(1)(c) did not apply in this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
WIS. STAT. § 59.34(1)(c) did not apply in this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bret J. Chapin
the PSI with him, and that he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to testify. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19880 - 2005-10-11
the PSI with him, and that he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to testify. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19880 - 2005-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel “was actually ineffective,” because “[i]t did not appear that Brown could meet the prejudice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318045 - 2020-12-23
counsel “was actually ineffective,” because “[i]t did not appear that Brown could meet the prejudice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318045 - 2020-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
statements would not have been successful. Although trial counsel did not recall Detective Craig’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27
statements would not have been successful. Although trial counsel did not recall Detective Craig’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of revocation counsel on the grounds that his counsel did not investigate the lifting of Porter’s parole hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79020 - 2014-09-15
of revocation counsel on the grounds that his counsel did not investigate the lifting of Porter’s parole hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79020 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
-examination, Falk asked Megan whether she ever got angry at McGary if he did not attend events at her school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97025 - 2013-05-21
-examination, Falk asked Megan whether she ever got angry at McGary if he did not attend events at her school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97025 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
Patricia Ann Johnson v. Bruce Hinton Johnson
matters and did not take a regular salary, but took funds out of his dental practice receipts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8442 - 2017-09-19
matters and did not take a regular salary, but took funds out of his dental practice receipts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8442 - 2017-09-19