Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8781 - 8790 of 98536 for civil court case status online.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the court for failing to attend a hearing. We affirm the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416690 - 2021-08-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
if the circuit court treated the PSI as an evidentiary submission in this case based upon counsel’s offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622237 - 2023-02-14

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2013
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES OCTOBER, 2013 The cases scheduled
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102487 - 2017-09-21

J. H. Findorff & Son, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3452-W Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17325 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
2015 WI 93 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2235-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149520 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶31 Slabey argues that this case is factually analogous to two federal court decisions which upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399777 - 2021-07-27

99-02 In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 70.40 -- Venue in Prisoner Cases
court shall use the family, criminal or civil case type designations when those designations
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1174 - 2005-03-31

99-02 In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 70.40 -- Venue in Prisoner Cases
court shall use the family, criminal or civil case type designations when those designations
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1001 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
App Sept. 28, 2016). In the prior case, we affirmed the circuit court’s order removing Simonson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210463 - 2018-04-04

State v. Peter J. McMaster
McMaster's urging, the court declined to consider this case under the United States Supreme Court case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17014 - 2005-03-31