Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8781 - 8790 of 50066 for our.

State v. Sean W. Ottman
) governs sentence credit.[1] In State v. Gilbert, 115 Wis. 2d 371, 340 N.W.2d 511 (1983), our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15975 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
degree of confidence in the result.” Davis III, No. 2006AP1534-CR, ¶10. Our decision governs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20

State v. Kyle D. Willenkamp
, the deputy added the phrase “our policy is blood.” ¶3 Willenkamp indicated that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2376 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas G. Martwick
within the curtilage of his home. The first issue we must address is our standard of review. Martwick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13515 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Anne C. Hepperla v. John D. Puchner
On our own motion, we consolidate these appeals for disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(3) (1999-2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14847 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
years to over 22 years.” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399053 - 2021-07-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
report sets forth an adequate discussion of these issues and our review of the records confirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289123 - 2020-09-22

[PDF] NOTICE
substantive crime is inconsequential to our resolution of the constitutionality of § 939.05. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32112 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
not undermine our confidence in the outcome of the case. Discovery Violation ¶8 Due process requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54755 - 2010-09-22

[PDF] NOTICE
by what I do here today but is going to be pretty much determined by how you respond when you’re in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59003 - 2014-09-15