Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8791 - 8800 of 82884 for case search.
Search results 8791 - 8800 of 82884 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Stephens has not responded. I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600834 - 2022-12-15
a response. Stephens has not responded. I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600834 - 2022-12-15
State v. Deandra S. Carter
the officers in this case had no reasonable suspicion for stopping Carter, the trial court erred in refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12704 - 2005-03-31
the officers in this case had no reasonable suspicion for stopping Carter, the trial court erred in refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12704 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence at the preliminary hearing; (2) failing to object to Ellis’s warrantless arrest, search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2009-05-18
of the evidence at the preliminary hearing; (2) failing to object to Ellis’s warrantless arrest, search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2009-05-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
of battery and disorderly conduct, with use of a dangerous weapon. In a separate case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34160 - 2014-09-15
of battery and disorderly conduct, with use of a dangerous weapon. In a separate case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34160 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Deandra S. Carter
was inadmissible. Because the officers in this case had no reasonable suspicion for stopping Carter, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12704 - 2017-09-21
was inadmissible. Because the officers in this case had no reasonable suspicion for stopping Carter, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12704 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
warrantless arrest, search, and seizure; and (3) failing to move for a directed verdict on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36480 - 2014-09-15
warrantless arrest, search, and seizure; and (3) failing to move for a directed verdict on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36480 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
at 715/346-1244 at 9:30 a.m. on 12/03/08 or his case would be dismissed. ¶3 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36612 - 2009-05-27
at 715/346-1244 at 9:30 a.m. on 12/03/08 or his case would be dismissed. ¶3 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36612 - 2009-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
in this civil action because it did not seek restitution in the criminal case against him. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100806 - 2013-08-12
in this civil action because it did not seek restitution in the criminal case against him. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100806 - 2013-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because it did not seek restitution in the criminal case against him. He also argues the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100806 - 2017-09-21
because it did not seek restitution in the criminal case against him. He also argues the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100806 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
2015 WI 46 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP2107-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141319 - 2015-06-14
2015 WI 46 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP2107-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141319 - 2015-06-14