Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8791 - 8800 of 30108 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
constitute reasonable suspicion, however, is de novo. State v. Powers, 2004 WI App 143, ¶6, 275 Wis. 2d 456
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83070 - 2012-05-29

[PDF] Darlene A. Bartelt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
¶5 We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7572 - 2017-09-19

City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
was sufficient. We review questions of law de novo. See State v. Brunton, 203 Wis. 2d 195, 201, 552 N.W.2d 452
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16113 - 2005-03-31

Frank Nordstrom v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company
. Wisconsin Mutual now appeals.[2] We review summary judgments de novo. Universal Die
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11860 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Peter D. Wicker
with the trial court’s assessment that the de minimis conflict in testimony did not rise to the level so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20040 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of restitution is within its discretion, whether a restitution order comports with the statute is subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158099 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts de novo. Id. ¶9 Sislo acknowledges that an arresting officer can rely on another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171232 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Id., ¶3. We review the issue de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶8 Here, Robert failed to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47143 - 2010-02-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶8 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel has two parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70432 - 2014-09-15

State v. Karim H. Scott-Newson
a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18, 241 Wis. 2d 631, 642, 623 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5964 - 2005-03-31