Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8791 - 8800 of 70045 for hi.
Search results 8791 - 8800 of 70045 for hi.
State v. Samuel Jones
appeals pro se from the trial court’s order denying his second motion for postconviction relief pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2005-03-31
appeals pro se from the trial court’s order denying his second motion for postconviction relief pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals from an order denying his petition for sentence adjustment. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627513 - 2023-02-28
, appeals from an order denying his petition for sentence adjustment. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627513 - 2023-02-28
[PDF]
State v. Edward Lee Hennings
Lee Hennings appeals pro se from an order summarily denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1997-98) motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16144 - 2017-09-21
Lee Hennings appeals pro se from an order summarily denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1997-98) motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16144 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Lamar S. Westbrook, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
. Lamar S. Westbrook, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ronald H. Gilpin
offense). He argues on appeal that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14263 - 2005-03-31
offense). He argues on appeal that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14263 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott E. Frye
an officer without probable cause and (2) violated his Fifth Amendment self-incrimination rights by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10831 - 2005-03-31
an officer without probable cause and (2) violated his Fifth Amendment self-incrimination rights by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10831 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
pursued Bista in his car, and the two had a brief conversation through the cars’ windows during which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39277 - 2009-08-10
pursued Bista in his car, and the two had a brief conversation through the cars’ windows during which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39277 - 2009-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
(2), 941.28(2), and 939.62 (2003-04), respectively.[1] Key also appeals from the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33823 - 2008-08-25
(2), 941.28(2), and 939.62 (2003-04), respectively.[1] Key also appeals from the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33823 - 2008-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) Before Fine, J. Undray B. appeals the order terminating his parental rights to Dreshaun B. Undray B
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101885 - 2017-09-21
) Before Fine, J. Undray B. appeals the order terminating his parental rights to Dreshaun B. Undray B
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101885 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 DUGAN, J.1 Steven Robert Sharpe appeals the circuit court’s order dismissing his small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239489 - 2019-04-23
. ¶1 DUGAN, J.1 Steven Robert Sharpe appeals the circuit court’s order dismissing his small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239489 - 2019-04-23