Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8791 - 8800 of 18714 for quote.

State v. James M. Smith
, 83 Wis.2d at 569, 266 N.W.2d at 325 (quoting Barker, 407 U.S. at 532). Smith does not suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8273 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Town of Wautoma v. City of Wautoma
of Madison, 70 Wis.2d 770, 773-74, 235 N.W.2d 493, 496 (1975) (quoting Town of Greenfield v. city
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12026 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
purpose’ of the statute.” Johnson, 347 Wis. 2d 238, ¶21 (quoted source omitted). We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144457 - 2015-07-15

State v. Michael V.P.
.” Richardson, 156 Wis.2d at 139, 456 N.W.2d at 834 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21). It is a common-sense test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15463 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Rickey Eugene Pinkard
) was renumbered WIS. STAT. § 961.01(6) in 1995. The quoted statutory language remains substantially similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19522 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Smothers
at 636 (quoting McMorris v. State, 58 Wis.2d 144, 152, 205 N.W.2d 559, 563 (1973)). Meyer’s wife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12965 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
106, ¶¶31-32, 255 Wis. 2d 632, 648 N.W.2d 507 (quoted source omitted). Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173808 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
467, 671 N.W.2d 18 (quoted source omitted). We know of no such requirement when a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104908 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
WI App 106, ¶¶31-32, 255 Wis. 2d 632, 648 N.W.2d 507 (quoted sources omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132754 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the agreement. Instead, the court’s focus, as quoted above, was entirely on whether there was a legal basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904707 - 2025-01-24