Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8801 - 8810 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8801 - 8810 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Harlan Richards v. Jane Gamble
review a circuit court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, accepting as true the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3789 - 2017-09-20
review a circuit court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, accepting as true the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3789 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ruth Woodring
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10581 - 2017-09-20
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10581 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. Flunker
not address this issue. Nos. 00-1835 and 00-1919-CR 4 law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2781 - 2017-09-19
not address this issue. Nos. 00-1835 and 00-1919-CR 4 law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2781 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Karl Meyer
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10583 - 2017-09-20
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10583 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth A. Albrecht
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9829 - 2017-09-19
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9829 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
Tony G. Merriweather v. Gerald Berge
confinement. ¶5 On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the agency making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5830 - 2005-03-31
confinement. ¶5 On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the agency making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the sufficiency of the complaint de novo, Kahn’s pleading falls far short. On appeal, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745135 - 2023-12-27
reviewing the sufficiency of the complaint de novo, Kahn’s pleading falls far short. On appeal, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745135 - 2023-12-27
[PDF]
Alvar Larson v. City of Elkhorn
of mandamus. Larson appeals. ¶4 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2326 - 2017-09-19
of mandamus. Larson appeals. ¶4 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2326 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on its face to entitle a defendant to an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
on its face to entitle a defendant to an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12