Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8811 - 8820 of 16410 for commentating.
Search results 8811 - 8820 of 16410 for commentating.
[PDF]
State v. Albert Gerald Kokke
the evidence.”) ¶18 A recognized commentator on evidence is in accord with our holding: No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3697 - 2017-09-19
the evidence.”) ¶18 A recognized commentator on evidence is in accord with our holding: No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3697 - 2017-09-19
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
because the court commented that “[t]here is a heavier burden to withdraw a plea when we are dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
because the court commented that “[t]here is a heavier burden to withdraw a plea when we are dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lou Ann Disch
that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain her. It is apparent from the circuit court’s comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5334 - 2005-03-31
that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain her. It is apparent from the circuit court’s comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alil Azizi
by the judge. Id. Here, the trial court's comments reveal its belief as to why the defendant was making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8987 - 2017-09-19
by the judge. Id. Here, the trial court's comments reveal its belief as to why the defendant was making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8987 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Paul Ringeisen v. Town of Forest
at the June 6 meeting. We conclude that counsel's comments to the board do not satisfy the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10265 - 2017-09-20
at the June 6 meeting. We conclude that counsel's comments to the board do not satisfy the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10265 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jeriline Campbell
of any traffic offenses. ¶6 While commenting that this was a close case, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
of any traffic offenses. ¶6 While commenting that this was a close case, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
….” This comment is unwarranted and violates a cardinal rule of appellate practice: avoid disparaging the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-23
….” This comment is unwarranted and violates a cardinal rule of appellate practice: avoid disparaging the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appears to take issue with two comments made by Greene in closing argument. First, Greene reiterated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91734 - 2014-09-15
appears to take issue with two comments made by Greene in closing argument. First, Greene reiterated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91734 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Turnel W. Smith
in the general sense must result from a violation of the criminal law. We were only commenting about how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12016 - 2017-09-21
in the general sense must result from a violation of the criminal law. We were only commenting about how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12016 - 2017-09-21
Brown County Human Services Department v. Kathy M.
their wishes were other than what I could glean from the various comments. The children’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6258 - 2005-03-31
their wishes were other than what I could glean from the various comments. The children’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6258 - 2005-03-31