Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8811 - 8820 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8811 - 8820 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of historical fact are clearly erroneous and review whether reasonable suspicion is met de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33956 - 2008-09-08
findings of historical fact are clearly erroneous and review whether reasonable suspicion is met de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33956 - 2008-09-08
[PDF]
Amerco Real Estate Company v. 525 Properties Limited Partnership
281, 289, 507 N.W.2d 136, 139 (Ct. App. 1993). Our review is de novo. See id. The first step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12681 - 2017-09-21
281, 289, 507 N.W.2d 136, 139 (Ct. App. 1993). Our review is de novo. See id. The first step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12681 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson, P.J., and Neubauer, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37585 - 2009-07-14
. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson, P.J., and Neubauer, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37585 - 2009-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 10, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶9 To be entitled to resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134700 - 2015-02-09
court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶9 To be entitled to resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134700 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation de novo. Frisch v. Henrichs, 2007 WI 102, ¶29, 304 Wis. 2d 1, 736 N.W.2d 85. Section 767.43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298729 - 2020-10-27
interpretation de novo. Frisch v. Henrichs, 2007 WI 102, ¶29, 304 Wis. 2d 1, 736 N.W.2d 85. Section 767.43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298729 - 2020-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of restitution is within its discretion, whether a restitution order comports with the statute is subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158099 - 2017-09-21
of restitution is within its discretion, whether a restitution order comports with the statute is subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Levi Booth
entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20701 - 2017-09-21
entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20701 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T.
. STAT. §§ 301.45 and 938.34. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6444 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. §§ 301.45 and 938.34. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6444 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Shawano v. Judith K. Minniecheske
of the challenges Minniecheske raises to her conviction presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9171 - 2017-09-19
of the challenges Minniecheske raises to her conviction presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9171 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts is a “new factor” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The defendant must establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28
of facts is a “new factor” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The defendant must establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28