Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8821 - 8830 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8821 - 8830 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id., ¶3. We review the issue de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶8 Here, Robert failed to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47143 - 2010-02-17
. Id., ¶3. We review the issue de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶8 Here, Robert failed to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47143 - 2010-02-17
Ray A. Peterson v. Regina K. Buie
an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT a. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5044 - 2005-03-31
an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT a. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5044 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we consider de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
is a question of law that we consider de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kanarowski, 170 Wis.2d 504, 509, 489
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10360 - 2017-09-20
presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kanarowski, 170 Wis.2d 504, 509, 489
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10360 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Adam D. Steinke
of law we review de novo. City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis. 2d 856, 857, 505 N.W.2d 448 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6978 - 2017-09-20
of law we review de novo. City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis. 2d 856, 857, 505 N.W.2d 448 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6978 - 2017-09-20
State v. Laurie J. Malone
The State argues that the sentencing court did not have the authority to stay the sentence and create “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16171 - 2005-03-31
The State argues that the sentencing court did not have the authority to stay the sentence and create “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16171 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfies the legal standards for ineffective assistance is a question of law we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244106 - 2019-07-23
satisfies the legal standards for ineffective assistance is a question of law we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244106 - 2019-07-23
[PDF]
State v. Julie A. Williams
to de novo review.” State v. Sisk, 2001 WI App 182, ¶7, 247 Wis. 2d 443, 634 N.W.2d 877. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5625 - 2017-09-19
to de novo review.” State v. Sisk, 2001 WI App 182, ¶7, 247 Wis. 2d 443, 634 N.W.2d 877. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5625 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment to Wiegert. Ranieri appeals. We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182367 - 2017-09-21
judgment to Wiegert. Ranieri appeals. We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182367 - 2017-09-21
City of Appleton v. Jennifer L. Drephal
in municipal traffic regulation cases, is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Setagord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15701 - 2005-03-31
in municipal traffic regulation cases, is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Setagord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15701 - 2005-03-31