Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8821 - 8830 of 69007 for had.
Search results 8821 - 8830 of 69007 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Randal M. Woodard
of OMVWI. ¶3 At trial, Woodard asserted that the State had not proved that he had operated his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5504 - 2017-09-19
of OMVWI. ¶3 At trial, Woodard asserted that the State had not proved that he had operated his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5504 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Warren had a strong odor of alcohol on his breath and bloodshot, glassy eyes. Warren admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91641 - 2014-09-15
that Warren had a strong odor of alcohol on his breath and bloodshot, glassy eyes. Warren admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91641 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jerry A. Foskett
] to strong[ly]” of intoxicants, and that his eyes were “glassy.” When asked whether he had been drinking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2269 - 2006-10-16
] to strong[ly]” of intoxicants, and that his eyes were “glassy.” When asked whether he had been drinking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2269 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
Frontsheet
reciprocal to a six-month suspension in Illinois and (2) that Attorney Cummings had violated SCR 22.22(1) 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207246 - 2018-01-19
reciprocal to a six-month suspension in Illinois and (2) that Attorney Cummings had violated SCR 22.22(1) 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207246 - 2018-01-19
[PDF]
Etta Dus v. Steven Ambrose Dus
that had not been NO. 97-0386 2 disclosed at the time of the initial divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12061 - 2014-09-15
that had not been NO. 97-0386 2 disclosed at the time of the initial divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12061 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Clemens Bartzen
in § 343.305(4)(c). Under the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9810 - 2017-09-19
in § 343.305(4)(c). Under the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9810 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by a jury after a trial. On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16
by a jury after a trial. On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16
State v. Ignacio P. Gonzalez
on an erroneous reading of the law that Gonzalez had the burden of proof at the refusal hearing, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16294 - 2005-03-31
on an erroneous reading of the law that Gonzalez had the burden of proof at the refusal hearing, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16294 - 2005-03-31
Rosie M. Bowers v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
9 p.m. when the temperature went down to 29 degrees. Bowers further stated that she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10590 - 2005-07-12
9 p.m. when the temperature went down to 29 degrees. Bowers further stated that she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10590 - 2005-07-12
State v. Mark G. Bargenquast
) because the requisite probable cause that Bargenquast had violated the OWI statute as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2013-10-29
) because the requisite probable cause that Bargenquast had violated the OWI statute as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2013-10-29