Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8831 - 8840 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 8831 - 8840 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. The State further agreed to take no position on whether the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560612 - 2022-08-30
years of extended supervision. The State further agreed to take no position on whether the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560612 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by 10 years’ extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether Scott’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058548 - 2026-01-06
confinement followed by 10 years’ extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether Scott’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058548 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. The no-merit report discusses whether the record would support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825745 - 2024-07-17
years of extended supervision. The no-merit report discusses whether the record would support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825745 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as fifteen years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. The court made explicit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857334 - 2024-10-09
as fifteen years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. The court made explicit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857334 - 2024-10-09
Christina Patterson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
probationary period was being extended for three months due to her confrontation with her co-workers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7933 - 2005-03-31
probationary period was being extended for three months due to her confrontation with her co-workers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sentenced to seven years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288382 - 2020-09-22
was sentenced to seven years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288382 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
followed by three years’ extended supervision on each of the two delivery counts— to be served concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
followed by three years’ extended supervision on each of the two delivery counts— to be served concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence of four years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840602 - 2024-08-21
sentence of four years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840602 - 2024-08-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, of twenty years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision for attempted first-degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212047 - 2018-04-26
, of twenty years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision for attempted first-degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212047 - 2018-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, and a lesser concurrent sentence on the resisting count. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326140 - 2021-01-21
of extended supervision, and a lesser concurrent sentence on the resisting count. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326140 - 2021-01-21