Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8841 - 8850 of 68276 for did.
Search results 8841 - 8850 of 68276 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion to suppress any evidence derived from the stop, alleging Atlas did not have a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30864 - 2007-11-13
filed a motion to suppress any evidence derived from the stop, alleging Atlas did not have a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30864 - 2007-11-13
Cun Xin Zheng v. Bradley Operating Limited Partnership
a promotional fund collected from tenants. The letter went on to report that the majority of mall tenants did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21408 - 2006-02-15
a promotional fund collected from tenants. The letter went on to report that the majority of mall tenants did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21408 - 2006-02-15
Dane County v. Lee R.
that Lee R. did not evince a substantial probability of physical harm to others is clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13822 - 2005-03-31
that Lee R. did not evince a substantial probability of physical harm to others is clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13822 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clifford J. Lennie
as he exited the vehicle a couple times and when he went back around." She did not, however, say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11983 - 2005-03-31
as he exited the vehicle a couple times and when he went back around." She did not, however, say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11983 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruven Seibert
who prepared the predisposition report had testified on behalf of the State at trial and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10511 - 2005-03-31
who prepared the predisposition report had testified on behalf of the State at trial and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan Moen
. He was convicted by a six‑person jury. Although he requested a twelve-person jury, he did not base
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14943 - 2005-03-31
. He was convicted by a six‑person jury. Although he requested a twelve-person jury, he did not base
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14943 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James A. Beau
therein was true and correct. Although the client did not herself enter the date she had signed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16939 - 2017-09-21
therein was true and correct. Although the client did not herself enter the date she had signed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16939 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dawn Dobbs
was insufficient to sustain the conviction. Because the trial court did not err in admitting the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9101 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to sustain the conviction. Because the trial court did not err in admitting the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Larry O. Loken
argument is that the evidence, when all of it is considered, supports its position that Loken did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13542 - 2017-09-21
argument is that the evidence, when all of it is considered, supports its position that Loken did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13542 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alfred L. Davenport, Jr.
to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Davenport's suppression motion, we affirm.[1] I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10645 - 2005-03-31
to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Davenport's suppression motion, we affirm.[1] I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10645 - 2005-03-31